Navigating the Murky Waters of Match-fixing in Esports: A Legal Perspective

Unmasking the Enemy – Understanding Match-fixing

Match-fixing, a term that has its roots in the English language, pertains to the deliberate act of “fixing” or influencing the outcome of a competition. At its core, it involves exerting undue influence on the course or outcome of a sporting contest, often through intentional underperformance or collusion. The Council of Europe’s Convention on the Manipulation of Sports Competitions (2019) provides a comprehensive definition, emphasizing its intentional nature and the objective of obtaining undue advantages.

In the realm of Esports, match-fixing can manifest in various forms. It can arise from collusions among team members, between opposing teams, or even involve referees. However, the act doesn’t always necessitate a group effort; individual players, through deliberate errors or intentional underperformance, can single-handedly manipulate game outcomes. Over the years, match-fixing has ascended as a significant threat to Esports, casting a shadow over its integrity and occasionally linking it to the sinister world of organized crime.

Notorious Cases in Esports

The Esports landscape has been marred by several high-profile matchfixing scandals that have sent shockwaves through the community. The 2014 “Counter-Strike Matchfixing Scandal” stands out as a stark reminder of the vulnerabilities within the system. Team “IBUYPOWER,” despite being the favorites, deliberately lost against “NetCodeGuides” to secure a previously placed bet. This incident not only tarnished the reputation of the players involved but also raised questions about the integrity of the entire Esports ecosystem.

Another infamous case involves a Russian Dota2 player who bet against his own team. Despite his team’s loss due to his intentional underperformance, his winnings amounted to a mere 322 US dollars. This incident gave birth to the term “322”, which has since become synonymous with intentional underperformance in the Esports community. Such incidents underscore the pervasive and detrimental impact of match-fixing on the industry, highlighting the need for stringent measures and regulations.

The Betting Conundrum

The Esports betting market, witnessing exponential growth, is intrinsically linked to the phenomenon of match-fixing. A 2018 survey revealed that 71% of professional Esports players believe there’s a direct correlation between the ability to bet on Esports competitions and the occurrence of match manipulations. This symbiotic relationship between betting and match-fixing is a ticking time bomb, threatening to undermine the credibility of Esports. With the Esports betting market projected to continue its upward trajectory, the allure of manipulating game outcomes for financial gains is likely to intensify, posing significant challenges for regulators and stakeholders.

Regulatory Approaches by Esports Associations and Tournament Organizers

In response to the growing menace of match-fixing, Esports associations and tournament organizers have been proactive in implementing regulatory frameworks and codes of conduct. These typically encompass collusion and betting prohibitions for participants, drawing inspiration from traditional sports leagues that have grappled with similar challenges.

The eSport-Bund Deutschland e.V. (ESBD), for instance, has established an “Ethics and Conduct Code” that strictly prohibits any form of collusion or manipulation. Similarly, the International eSport Federation (IeSF) and the eSports Integrity Commission (ESIC) have instituted comprehensive regulations to combat match-fixing and betting within the sport. These efforts, while commendable, face challenges in terms of enforcement and compliance.

Challenges and Future Prospects

Despite the regulatory strides made, enforcing non-governmental norms remains a significant challenge. Private entities, despite their best intentions, often lack the enforcement capabilities of prosecution authorities and criminal courts. This enforcement gap poses a significant risk, as non-compliance with integrity rules can go unchecked, rendering them ineffective.

For the Esports industry, ensuring its integrity is paramount. As the sector seeks further political and legal support, its reputation and credibility are on the line. Match-fixing, if unchecked, can erode the trust of fans, players, and stakeholders, jeopardizing the future growth and acceptance of Esports.

Conclusion

The battle against match-fixing in Esports is an ongoing saga. It demands a holistic approach, intertwining legal, ethical, and regulatory strategies. As the Esports industry continues to evolve, safeguarding its integrity will be pivotal in ensuring its sustained growth, reputation, and acceptance both politically and socially.

Image source: Simez78 on Shutterstock